Showing posts with label verapamil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label verapamil. Show all posts

Friday, 21 March 2014

A patients perspective: A brief overview of all things Ledderhose

This condition, which for simplicities sake I will just call Ledderhose, is an often painful condition which presents as a lump or knot in the arch of the foot or feet. The purpose of this introduction is to try and make a concise overview of the significant amount of information I have learnt over the last 3 years. 

This information has come from books, the internet, and conversations with patients, conversations with doctors and conversations with scientists. I hope to cover a little bit about what the disease is, how it can present itself and how this can be very different patient to patient. I am going to look at the risk factors and the different treatment options and will try my best to offer an unbiased opinion on the treatment options. 

If you are new to the condition hopefully you will find this helpful, if you are familiar with the condition then perhaps you might still learn something. I hope to be able to tell it as a patient, first developing the condition (risk factors), seeking information (the basics of the condition), disease progression and then treatment followed by anything else I see fit. 


Much of the information I have taken from conversations on the related condition Dupuytren's, here I will basically treat the conditions as the same thing from a risk factors and science point of view, the treatment options are Ledderhose specific. 

Developing the condition

Ledderhose is not something you can catch from another person, well not like a cold, but it often will have genetic links. It is thought that Ledderhose requires several changes to a pathway as well as perhaps a triggering traumatic event. The genetic changes that are required can be inherited from your parents, this will greatly increase the odds of you developing the conditions. 

A family history is by no means required for this condition to develop and indeed a strong family history does not mean you will 100% develop the condition. See the family trees shown below: 


Figure 1: 
a) Family tree of a patient with no family history.             






b) Family Tree from a family with a lot of family history of Ledderhose and related conditions.








As you can see from the 1st family tree there is no genetic predisposition for the condition, there is no family history of the condition, this either means that there was no underlying genetic element in this patient or the individual patient likely developed many themselves. The 2nd family tree shows a strong family history of the condition, this likely meaning that they have many of the predisposing genetic elements in place from birth and are therefore highly susceptible to developing the condition. 

What does this genetic side mean? That those who have a genetic background are more likely to develop the condition. 

There are many other factors that have also been linked to the progression of this condition. Nothing has really been proven but it appears that doing things that give you a chance of having underlying health issues will likely results in an increase in your odds of developing Ledderhose.

Other factors that have been linked to these conditions includes over drinking. More specifically it seems to be linked to the possible liver damage that can come from over drinking. Diabetes is another proposed risk factor. The conditions have been linked to various insulin related pathways so it is not surprising that a defect in this pathway can increase the odds of developing these conditions. Another possible risk factor is smoking this causes underlying health issues and in many cases could be linked to excessive drinking.

The final risk factor that I shall mention is trauma. Trauma to the foot could be picked up on many ways e.g. I may have stepped on a stone when running and I have heard a child developing the condition after damaging their foot (personal communication). I shall not go into detail here but Ledderhose seems to share pathways and processes with the healing and scar process and it could be an over-activation of these pathways that ultimately causes the condition. So if you think you are at risk there is no harm in being careful with your feet. 

Disease Basics

So maybe the disease basics should have come first by personally I had no clue what this conditions was before I started developing it and therefore felt that its rightful place was after the factors that can increase your chances of developing the condition. 

Ledderhose lumps are basically a ball of cells that are growing too quickly, therefore they form a tumour. This is much the same process as cancer except they cannot spread so please do not confuse the 2, in fact see this post on why this condition is not cancer. The lumps that are formed are very hard, this is because the nodules that form are high in collagen. Collagen is a protein that is often found in repairing tissue and this is why the condition is thought to start with a trauma and develop as an overreaction to the repair that is necessary. 

Diagnosis and Progression

Diagnosis is normally initially achieved through palpation of the lump and will often then be confirmed with an ultra-sound or ultimately an MRI. It is not until an MRI is performed that the tissue can truly be differentiated between basic scar tissue and a fibroma [Personal Communication].

Disease progression is highly variable, not just in terms of the size of the lump(s) but also in terms of pain. As an example one patient could have a large lump and no pain, another patient a small lump but a lot of pain, the patient with the large lump could have only developed the lump in the last few months whilst the smaller lump may have taken years to develop. I for example had a gradual increase in pain over the course of a couple years until it reached the point where I could not walk. Despite me being unable to walk my lump was not that big. It is not possible to tell whether a lump will become painful or not and therefore it is not possible to guess what the best treatment option will be.

Treatments and considerations:

There are many different treatment options but there is no perfect treatment option. Below I am going to try and cover some of the more common treatment options and discuss the pros and cons:

Surgery:

Surgery has long been the go to treatment for Ledderhose patients. However surgery has also had the problem that it suffers from high recurrence rates. This means that for a lot of patients that have surgery the lumps with grow back. I have spoken to some patients who have had surgery work and are happy with the results many years after treatment. I have also spoken to patients who are unhappy with the results of surgery just months after they had the treatment. I have spoken to one person has had 20 plus surgeries and is still battling the condition. The success rates have increased with the use of greater margins or complete removal of the plantar fascia.

The Pros for surgery are that it is the standard treatment used and is readily accessible.

The cons are numerous. It is invasive, requires a long time off of the foot, it requires physiotherapy and the chances of the condition coming back are high.


Radiotherapy

Me getting Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy has emerged in the last 20 years as a real treatment option for many benign conditions including Dupuytren’s and Ledderhose. When performed correctly the success rate is in the region of 80% of patients seeing an improvement. I personally have had radiotherapy and for me it has worked really well, the process is 5 treatments on consecutive days followed by a repeat of that around 8 weeks later, each treatment takes 5-10 minutes. I went from using a walking stick and being in a lot of pain to being in less pain, then I could stop using the stick and then I started running and completed a 10km run. Overall I couldn’t be happier with how it went for me. I have heard of it not working for some patients and there are risks. Any radiotherapy, even the lose doses used in this treatment, will increase the risk of the patient developing cancer. I suffered from dry and itchy skin on my foot for several months which was irritating but E45 helped.   

The pros are the treatment has a good success rate and is not invasive and doesn't require time off of your feet.
The cons are that in the UK at least you will have to go private to get the treatment and the increased risk of cancer. Limited locations offer radiotherapy for Ledderhose and related conditions.

Other options:

On the NHS in the UK the final option provided is surgery, as mentioned you can get radiotherapy and there are other treatments that will get tried first or are just becoming available.

The first of these is steroid injections. In some cases it has been found that steroid injections can ease the pain and shrink the lumps that are caused by Ledderhose. These injections can be very painful and one specialist I spoke to advised against them because "There is no specific evidence that I am aware of that steroid injection helps or improves this condition" [Link]. There is no overwhelming evidence that it will help and it can cause problems with the tendon. I did have a steroid injection, it did hurt but it did seem to ease symptoms for around 6 months to a year.

The second option is very likely to just be a stop gap solution. This option is orthotics. Orthotics are shoe inserts that are supposed to help distribute weight around your foot and take weight off of the lump. They can help but will need changing if the lump is growing or your walking bio-mechanics are changing as the pain increases. I still use orthotics now, for me they are more of a corrective tool to try and help me walk normally now that the pain has gone.

The third option is just becoming available in the UK, cryotherapy / cryosurgery. This option involves freezing the area with a very cold needle, this numbs the pain indefinitely and has been shown to have good results. This treatment does not however have any publications proving it is a good and viable treatment option. There are also very few locations worldwide that offer this treatment for Ledderhose.

The fourth and final option is a gel called Verapamil. I am not aware of this being widely available in the UK but it is available in the USA. The gel is supposed to block a pathway required for nodule formation and this will stop growth and ideally cause the lump to shrink. I guess the best way to sum this treatment up is as a quick summary of most patient responses; 
"Verapamil may have helped, it may have stopped it from getting worse or have slowed it down but I am not sure". The gel seems to help some, in most it helps but not enough.  

I have not mentioned Xiapex, this is an enzyme injection. In theory it and similar injections can be used in the foot but this is currently mainly a Dupuytren's treatment. 

After treatment:

What happens after you have had treatment is highly variable not only from treatment to treatment but also from person to person. With surgery there will be time on crutches and a high chance of it coming back. With radiotherapy there will be dry skin and the increased risk of cancer. 

Something that all patients will have in common is the fear it will come back or indeed the fear it will spread. The hands and the feet are all potential targets as is the shoulder and other areas I would rather not talk about.  

Summary

I guess one of the biggest things is that the ultimate go to option still seems to be surgery, yet here is a quote I got from a UK surgeon about this condition: 

"Finally the text book, which is Surgery of the Foot and Ankle, is probably the most authoritative text we have on foot and ankle surgery and it quotes “attempted surgical resection is best avoided”."

This shows that the go to treatment option is one that is best avoided. I am not saying don't have surgery I just think that you should always discuss all the options with your doctor before having surgery for this condition as there is no guarantee it will help, in fact it can even make things worse. 

Now patients and professionals need to work together to improve patient care, to improve both professional and patient awareness of all the treatment options and make sure that everyone gets the treatment that gives them the best chance to heal.  

References

You might want to check out the following link: Plantar Fibroma - A real pain in the foot

For more information on different section and to see where I obtained the original information from please use the following links: 

Risk Factors:

Genetics

Dupuytren's Disease and Related Hyperproliferative disorders, Chapter 11 - The Genetic Basis of Dupuytren's: An introduction

Is Dupuytren's in your DNA?  - A blog post previously done by me

Diabetes: 

Elhadd et al, 2007, Plantar Fibromatosis and Dupuytren’s disease: an association to remember in patients with diabetes, Diabetic Medicine, 24, p1305:

Stradner et al, 1987, Dupuytren's contracture as a concomitant disease in diabetes mellitus, Wien Med Wochenschr, Vol 137, p89-92.  



Alcohol and smoking: 

Harrt and Hooper, Postgrad Med J 81:425-428 doi:10.1136/pgmj.2004.027425, http://pmj.bmj.com/content/81/957/425.long


Burge et al, 1997, also find the same results as the above paper in that alcohol is related to Dupuytren's and this is further backed up by (5) Bradlow et al 1986

Gudmundsson et al, 2001, Scand J Health care, vol 19.

An HS, SouthworthSR, JacksonWT, RussB. Cigarette smoking and Dupuytren's contracture of the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1988Nov;13(6):872-4.

Treatments: 


Cryosurgery post by me with more links contained

Steroid injections: 

Steroid injection - a post by me 



Meek et al, 2002,The effect of steroids on Dupuytren's disease: role of programmed cell death, J Hand Surg Br. 2002 Jun;27(3):270-3.accessed 21//01/2012

Plantar Fibroma Support Forum - Post by peekaboo64 http://plantarfibroma.freeforums.org/injections-t9.html

Dupuytren Online, Steroid Injections - http://www.dupuytren-online.info/dupuytren_steroids.html accessed 21/01/2012

Othotics: 

Orthotics: a post by me


Radiotherapy: 

Personal experience and personal communication with Dr Shaffer and other medical professionals

Interview with Dr Richard Shaffer - He covers a lot of the basics and there is some good information.

Radiotherapy post by me

Book: Radiation Therapy for Early Stages of Morbus Ledderhose: Dupuytren’s Disease and related hyperproliferative disorders, chapter 50 – Long-Term Outcome of Radiotherapy for Primary and Recurrent Ledderhose Disease:

Surgery: 

Personal communication with multiple patients 

Surgery a post by me 

Dupuytren's Disease and Related Hyperproliferative Disorders: Principles, Research, and Clinical Perspectives -

Charles Eaton M. Heinrich Seegenschmiedt Ardeshir Bayat Giulio Gabbiani Paul Werker Wolfgang Wach  

Saturday, 25 January 2014

A patient experience of Cryotherapy and Verapamil

About 5 years ago, I developed a bump behind my big toe on my right foot.  I had no idea what is was.  I mentioned it to my doctor, who is a very well connected Dr, in Philadelphia.  (I drive 2 hours to visit him from my home town).  He referred me to Dr. Robert Cohen.

I really had no idea what to expect, and sort of assumed that as long as it was not cancer, it was going to be no big deal.  Well, it was not a cancer, and Dr. Cohen confirmed it.  At this point, I had no real discomfort, but was worried about the bump.

He put me on Verapamil as the initial treatment, and it did not really do anything. 

Dr. Cohen subsequently did a cryosurgery on it, and I really expected it to be broken up and dramatically shrunken after the procedure.  I revisited a few weeks later, and the Dr. was quite happy with the change in size and shape.  I personally really did not notice any significant shrinkage, but it had become a bit elongated.

Over the next 2 years, I did the procedure 2 more times, with nominal results, that were duly noted by Dr. Cohen after he ran an ultrasound each time.

After the 3rd treatment, I stopped going.  I really did not feel any great change, and I had not really had any significant pain anyway. 

I had been given a pair of orthotics to lengthen my arch, with a small shaping around the fibroma to remove some of the impact on it as well.

I went through the next 2 years, with no real concern about the fibroma, and I felt like the cryosurgery was pointless.

I have recently changed my mind.  The fibroma has gotten a little bit larger, and is much more painful.  I get the burning sensation that others describe.  In particular, each morning when I first put weight on it.

I will be going in February to have it evaluated again, and have a new cryosurgery.  I am hoping it will disrupt the fibroma enough to set it back to where it was just an annoying bump without the intermittent pain and burning.

The Cryo process

The surgery is really simple.  They numb the foot, cut a small (size of a drinking straw) hole in your foot, and insert a tube that forces cold (like a dry ice) into the fibroma. They continue this insertion until the point where the cold my damage other tissues.  You are wrapped in a sterile bandage, and your foot is wrapped in a hard paper boot, that diverts weight around the arch, and you walk out.

After 3 days, you take the bandage off, and put anti biotic on twice a day like a normal cut, and go about your business.

Cryosurgery is NOT a cure.  Not even close.  It may not even reduce the fibroma.  But, my instincts tell me that it did delay any increase in size, prevented pain within the fibroma, and was a good thing.

I would like to emphasize that my final thought in cryo is that it is a tool to reduce pain, nominally shrink and reshape the fibroma and slow the process down.

Tuesday, 12 June 2012

Continued Pain after radiotherapy for Ledderhose

I wrote last week about how my foot has been bad since about a week after I finished radiotherapy and this has continued into this week (yes the capital P in Pain in the title was intentional). The pain is bad and some people are starting to realise just how bad whilst others are obliviousness and the GP was as ever unhelpful.

I went to the GP this morning to get some more co-codamol as this is the on thing that seems to take the pain away even though that is by sending me to sleep. Still it means I can take it in the evenings and I don't have pain getting to sleep. So I went to the GP, this is the same GP that refused to give me pain killers last time when I was on nothing that helped.

So I went in and explained that when I was at the foot specialist last time I was given some stronger pain killers and that although these help I end up asleep and I can't take them at work. I then went on to say how at work I am in a lot of pain and I can't take the pain killers. He just gave me a prescription and sent me on my way. To be honest I was happy to get out there with more pain killers given what happened last time. The thing was though he just didn't seem to care, he didn't acknowledge that I was using a walking stick, he didn't show any sympathy for the fact I am in a lot of pain at work and made no suggestions and didn't offer to try different pain killers and I thought Doctors were supposed to want to do whatever they can to help?

Anyway I am in continued pain from last week, I am struggling to walk and therefore struggling to do my job but for the moment at least I am going on in hope of seeing some benefits from radiotherapy which can't come soon enough. I was regularly close to tears on several occasions today, this is something which can't gone on and I am going to to have to book an appointment with an alternative Doctor to see if they have any better ideas or at least will listen to me. 

On a positive note I was left a really nice comment on my last post today. People leaving comments saying that this blog has helped means a lot as that is the main reason for me doing it. Thank you to anyone who has left a comment and indeed to anyone in the future who leaves one.


Sam said:
"I just wanted to say thanks for having this blog, I was recently diagnosed with plantar fibromatosis and the amount of information in regards to dealing with this disease is very minimal on the internet.

I was prescribed verapamil ointment which I rub on my lump twice a day, have only been on it for a week now but have high hopes this helps as the other options in America are lacking. It seems straight up radiation treatment isn't even offered in the US, only after post-surgery. Anywho I will be watching and hoping for good news on your progress"


Sunday, 8 April 2012

Verapamil for treatment of Ledderhose Disease and related disorders

Verapamil gel for the treatment of Plantar Fibromas / Plantar Fibromatosis / Ledderhose Disease:

After my interview with Petricd I said I would do a post on Verapamil gel and so here it is. This is a gel which you rub on to the lump. It is advertised as for use with Dupuytren's and Ledderhose and a good place to go for information (albeit a place that is trying to sell the stuff) is pdlabs (1a).

How and why does Verapamil gel help a plantar fibroma / ledderhose disease?

Right so this is the bit where a little bit of research is required. I figure that a good place to start is the pdlabs website and for the purposes of this post I went to the Ledderhose disease section (1b). Here they explain that the nodules that form in Ledderhose disease or indeed Dupuytren's contracture are mainly caused by an excess of collagen and that one of the requirements for collagen production is calcium and that verapamil works as it is a calcium channel blocker. The idea is that in cells you have a battle between the production of collagen and the breakdown of collagen and in the disease cells the battle is being won by collagen production so it builds up but by adding in verapamil you reduce the levels of collagen production and turn the course of the war in the favour of collagen breakdown which it then ideally wins by breaking down the lump or they reach a stalemate by at least stopping progression. 

Results?: 

This is where is gets a bit tricky. So to start with I have referred to the book Dupuytren's Disease and related hyperproliferative disorders (2). They say that this is still a work in progress but that the reports that have been generated so far by users on the Dupuytren's online forum suggest that it does not work very well. A very good thread to look at here is this one. Some of the comments that members have are quite harsh and it makes you wonder about the validity of the results PDlabs say they have below. Anyway here are some quotes from the thread I have linked to above: 

Randy H - "Contact the folks at PD labs and ask for any published studies on the product for your particular usage. I doubt they have anything. I tried it anyway........with no results." 

Bruce - " ...it is a complete waste of money and time. These guys should be shut down for deception."

JimH- "It does nothing. Ask your MD what information he has regarding its effectiveness and I'll bet he admits he has none."

Debrr - "Just to let you know I gave up on verapamil. Overall, didn't seem to do anything for me."

If you have a look round the forum most of the reviews by members that have Dupuytren's, Ledderhose or both are negative but still on to the other side of things.

So what do PDlabs say? Well they say that you need to be using this for 6-12 months and that those that are experience pain find that this is the first thing to disappear and that this usually happens within 90 days. They say that they are in the middle of clinical trials and that they are so far going very, see this page for details but to summarise they say that 100% of patients are experiencing a decrease in pain and most are having a decrease in size as well. 

Side Effects

As far as I am aware there are no side effects to using this on your feet, however it is also in use (though not for LD/DD treatment) in the form of a tablet which does have some side effects but I won't put them here as they might confuse things. 

Experience

I have had no experience with this but I have come across several posts on the Dupuytren's online forum but most of the people that have had this treatment have not got back to me. The one person that has though is the one that I mentioned earlier, Petricd, whom has had some success with verapamil on their Ledderhose but not their Dupuytren's. 

References

(1a) - http://pdlabs.net - Site accessed 07/04/2012 - a provider of Verapamil.
(1b) -http://pdlabs.net/plantar_fibromatosis/whatIsTvGel_plantar.html
(2) Dupuytren’s Disease and Related Hyperproliferative Disorders, Principles, Research, and Clinical Perspectives Eaton, C.; Seegenschmiedt, M.H.; Bayat, A.; Gabbiani, G.; Werker, P.; Wach, W. (Eds.) 2012.

Saturday, 7 April 2012

LD, DD and knuckle pad patient using Verapamil gel - Petricd

Right so everyone it is time for another patient interview again I have contacted this person using the Dupuytren's online forum. I contacted this person because they have been using verapamil gel. For those who don't know what this is I recommend you visit the PDlabs website but it is a gel that you apply to the the disease areas and it helps to stop progression and maybe reduce nodules. I may do a treatments post on this to explain further but from the PDlabs website HERE it says that it is a calcium channel blocker and calcium is required for the production of collagen. 

Anyway thanks to Patricd for agreeing to do this and providing the answers below. 



1) Do you have Ledderhose Disease, Dupuytren’s disease or both? 


I have both Ledderhose and Dupuytren's as well as knuckle pads to boot!

2) Do you have a family history of the disease? If yes how prevalent is it? 


Yes my father, and his brother have it in their palms but no contracture, just lots of webbing and cording.

3) How long have you been symptomatic? 


I have been symptomatic for 1 1/2 years.

4) What treatments have you received? 


I have just had transdermal verapamil gel as I do not yet have a contracture of the fingers (but a cord can be felt).

5) How successful were these treatments? 


The Verapamil lotion eliminated the night pain in my feet and softened the tumors in my feet. Can't say it did much to the knuckel pads or the cords in my palms.

6) You said you had verapamil treatment, what was this experience like? 


It is just a case of applying the gel and costs $69 per 1 1/2 month supply made by a compounding pharmacy at 10% concentration cream.

7) Are you currently satisfied with the treatment that you have received?


Yes it has worked better on my feet than hands. No other treatment is available except Xiaflex but it is not FDA approved for knuckle pads or plantar fibromitosis. 


Summary: 


So as you can see the results for this are average. I have not seen any data that suggests that this works properly and in fact if you look on the Dupuytren's Society page it is shown as only have anecdotal evidence for it. Clearly the person above has had good results on their feet and the prices that they have it for are not too bad compared to some of the other more proven options. 


As I said I hope to do a treatments page on this and see what evidence I can find for it working and maybe seen if I can find the exact science behind why it works. Hope you enjoyed the interview and thanks again to Patricd.  

Saturday, 31 March 2012

Things to discuss with specialist

So as many of you will know I have my next appointment with the foot specialist on Monday and I have lots of things that I want to discuss with him. Last time that I went I was fairly happy with the way the orthotics were working but this has changed drastically since then and I am now unhappy with the way that things are so I have many things to discuss with him.
  1. More lumps? or just complications - I have been getting more and more pain towards the toes on my left foot and I am wondering if I have a lump down there or I am sure I have heard some people mention cords in the foot. I must admit that I cannot feel anything but perhaps something that might suggest there is something came up in the MRI? Though I am not sure how big an area they covered. That the pain now is enough that I am often struggling to walk, using a walking stick from time to time and it can stop me from getting to sleep and has once or twice in the last few weeks woken me up, I was checking this morning and I am sure the lump is getting bigger again. It is also now starting to affect my work and that I have times where my foot goes numb along the base and what does he make of that?
  2. My Right foot - This has been feeling increasingly painful in the arch and in a specific area and in this area I think I can feel a lump so I am wondering if I maybe getting it bilateral but I am not sure and perhaps I am just being paranoid.
  3. Can I have a copy of my MRI pictures?
  4. Pain relief, can I have some please?
  5. What does he think is the best option for me now?
  • Is it radiotherapy and is it in another country or this country?
  • Is it Xiapex or some similar injection?
  • A gel like Verapamil? - I have heard many more stories of this not working rather than working.
  • Is it, in his opinion, surgery? (which I will avoid)

I will of course be trying to remember everything that went on and will hopefully be able to post back in details what the guy said and whether I found it helpful or pointless. If I see the same guy as I saw last time I am at least hopeful that he can advise me on what he genually feels is the best option as he will know about radiotherapy and the other options but if I get the guy I saw the first time I think I will probably be making a complaint to the NHS about the lack of knowledge that this guy has.

In order to go armed I will be taking my book, the Dupuytren's Disease and Related Hyperproliferative disorders book with me as I know it at least mentions radiation to treat Ledderhose and Xiapex to treat Dupuytren's.

Monday, 21 November 2011

Treatments for Plantar Fibromas

Over the years I have done a lot of research into the different options available for people with Ledderhose / plantar fibroma's and although there are treatments out there none are a cure. Below are some therapies that might help, I found some of the details for these from http://www.dupuytren-online.info/ledderhose_therapies.html and on the British Dupuytren's Society.

Radiation therapy – 

It is thought that radiation therapy can help stop the progression of the disease however this only works if it is in the earlier stages, if the condition is more developed then it can still help reduce the size of the lump, however of course radiation is not good for your body in general as it can introduce mutations which can lead to cancer. However, in the UK on the NHS at least, the chances of receiving this for Ledderhose disease is very slim as it has not been approved for use on this and also due to very long waiting lists and priority, rightly so, being given to cancer patients. See here for more details. It is available privately and contact me if you want information as this is a procedure that I have had. 

Steroid / Cortizone injections – 

Having had one of these I can say that the administration of the local anaesthetic hurts a lot and then you have a weird sensation of the application of the steroid as you can feel it going in and around the lump but there is no pain or anything, however don’t go back to work afterwards as I did as the local will stop working after a few hours and if you are anything like me you won’t be able to walk and I would also think about taking the next day off as well to help it recover. However these can cause a reduction in size and slow progression an it helped me for about 6 months before everything returned. See here for more detail. 

Cryosurgery – 

Although only use a few times it has had some success. Basically the idea here is to freeze the diseased tissue using deep freezing with something like liquid nitrogen, to be honest having worked with liquid nitrogen this option scares me a little as the stuff used in the wrong way can easily be lethal, though I am sure in the quantities used it is perfectly safe. However there is the known side effect that it can produce hard scar tissue which then results in pain when walking meaning that the end result may not be too different to leaving it alone.  See here for more details.

Surgery – 

This is the one way to actually remove the lump and is sometimes basically the only option left once it is big enough and painful enough. Clearly with the load bearing that the foot has to undertake on a daily basis there are going to be side effects and additional some people have reported that post surgery nodules have grown back quicker and worse than before, meaning that this option needs to be treated as a last resort and with a certain degree of caution, I have seen posts of people saying do not consider this, just do not do it, so is it better to try this and maybe get better or continue as you are? See here for more details.

Verapamil – 

This is a calcium channel blocker that has been used in the treatment of other conditions and it is thought to work by blocking the release of collagen this changes steady state levels of production of collagen and break down by collagenases so that there is more break down to compared to production when means that the levels of collagen, thought to be the main part of the lump, are decreased and thus the size and pain produced are decrease. See here for more details.

Orthotics

These are basically shoe inserts that take the pressure off of the lump, if they work they are a great treatment as they are non-invasive. See here for detail.

Physiotherapy – 

I have seen online that this can be recommended, however I have been to 2 physios, 1 was NHS and 1 was private and both of them told me there was nothing that they could do to help with this and for me this was just a step in the pathway towards getting proper treatment.

Enzyme Injections (added 2021) - 

In theory not approved in many countries for Ledderhose but there are collagenase injections being used and the treatment used by Dr Davis

I hope what I have put here helps someone, if you need more then browse the pages specific for those treatments.